They said girl with my first baby and he was a boy
Can be about 70% accurate if assessed by a sonographer on a live scan (although this isn’t much better than the 50% of just having a random guess). When looking at a still the odds of being correct sit around 50%. Cousin is a sonographer and thinks “nub theory specialists” are thieves and crooks 😅🙈
Paid £20 to have it reviewed, it said 90% girl, turned out to be a boy! So i would absolutely skip it in your place 😂
I think there is still room for error because it’s an image instead of someone confirming via a live ultrasound, and it’s still early enough for things to change. You could look at doing one of the sneak peak blood tests?